politics

500 Million Acres: Can the Trump Administration’s Task Force Finally Solve America's Housing Crisis?

HUD’s Scott Turner and Interior’s Doug Burgum are spearheading a bold initiative to reduce bureaucracy and improve the efficiency of federal land management, empowering local solutions across Nevada and Utah.

April 2, 2025

Summary

HUD Secretary Scott Turner and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum propose utilizing 500 million acres of federal land.

A Joint Task Force will streamline land transfers and cut through the red tape to speed up residential developments.

The strategy requires close collaboration with state and local authorities to identify areas with the greatest need, while also protecting vulnerable natural habitats.

Initiatives in Nevada and Utah highlight urgent regional demands for faster developer access amid persistent housing shortages.

The proposal aims to significantly reduce construction costs by reducing excessive federal regulations and offering selective tax exemptions.

The affordable housing crisis is pressing, and the Trump administration is aggressively tackling this challenge by considering almost 500 million acres of federal land—ranging from underutilized urban areas to suburban locales—as viable sites for affordable homes. HUD Secretary Scott Turner recently pointed out that the nation boasts roughly 500 million acres of land that could support affordable housing. His comments underscore an administration ready to take decisive action at a time when soaring costs and scarce options burden countless Americans. At the core of this plan is the new Joint Task Force on Federal Land for Housing, a collaborative effort between Turner and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. In a joint Wall Street Journal op‐ed, they set forth a detailed plan of action: the task force will target regions where housing shortages are most critical, while also identifying federal lands that state and local officials could either lease or receive in transfers. The goal is to streamline administrative processes and speed up environmental reviews and property transfers. A pivotal component of the proposal is the reduction of regulatory hurdles that have inflated construction costs. White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers explained that the strategy is proactively designed not only to eliminate delays but also to introduce new tax incentives and modern leasing methods—a welcomed shift from the previously restrictive policies. Of equal importance, the plan makes clear that highly valued areas like national parks and wildlife refuges will continue receiving full protection. The push for more efficient development is especially notable in places like Nevada and Utah. In Nevada, where nearly 80% of the land is federally managed, local leaders—including Gov. Joe Lombardo—are demanding quicker access to these lands, with counties like Clark County bracing against a projected housing shortfall by 2032. Over in Utah, the challenge is stark: a gap of an estimated 44,000 housing units combined with a steep jump in median home prices from $305,000 to $535,000. Utah Gov. Spencer Cox has set an ambitious goal of 35,000 new starter homes by 2028, aligning with local calls for smarter zoning and stronger public-private partnerships. Turner and Burgum have been explicit that while the initiative incorporates a variety of measures, it is built on a foundation of responsible development. The task force is charged with balancing rapid progress with critical environmental protection and community needs by rigorously reviewing existing environmental restrictions and land-use policies. Even as critics raise concerns about potential environmental impacts and the possibility of misallocated development, the team’s commitment to a thorough review process remains unwavering. This initiative represents a major shift in federal housing policy. By cutting unnecessary regulations and decentralizing decision-making power to local leaders, the administration aims to reduce construction costs and accelerate project timelines. For both policymakers and prospective homeowners, the core message is clear: this is a pivotal move toward a housing market driven by innovation, efficiency, and a purposeful reduction in excessive government intervention.